English is my primary working language and Italian my native one. My written and spoken Dutch is limited, so meetings, documentation and delivery happen in English. I would rather say it on this page than at the first meeting.
Yes. I am based in Amsterdam, so workshops and key sessions on-site in Amsterdam and the Randstad are easy to arrange. Day-to-day delivery is usually remote; for EU clients outside the Netherlands we work mostly on video.
Through my registered Dutch entity (KvK 42083735, BTW NL005481493B60), with invoices in EUR. Direct engagement or through Dutch agencies and detachering structures, depending on what your procurement requires. T&M or fixed scope.
West Europe (Netherlands) as primary region by default, North Europe (Ireland) for pairing and disaster recovery, and other EU regions where a service or GPU capacity requires it. Every cross-region data flow is a documented decision.
When you need faster scalability, shorter time-to-market or stronger resilience than on-prem. Before migrating, run a technical and financial assessment workload by workload.
It depends on timeline, budget and system criticality. In many cases a hybrid path works best: migrate first, then selectively modernize high-impact components.
Use a shared baseline: identity governance, policy-as-code, centralized logging and regular control reviews. Compliance is not a one-off project, it is an ongoing process.
It depends on workload count, dependencies and business constraints. To avoid delays, start with a phased roadmap and measurable milestones.
With progressive migration waves, realistic testing environments and explicit rollback plans. Each phase must be validated before moving to the next.
Yes. In many enterprise contexts it is the best option. Some workloads stay on-prem due to regulation, latency or cost, while others benefit from cloud.
It depends on your starting maturity. In practice, early gains usually come from rightsizing, non-prod controls and basic tagging/budget governance.
Three steps: reliable cost visibility, team accountability and an optimization backlog with owners and deadlines. Without these, FinOps becomes just reporting.
At least monthly for trends and anomalies, with a deeper quarterly review of architecture and policies. Cloud costs change too quickly for annual-only control.
Fabric is often faster for integrated analytics in the Microsoft stack. Databricks is stronger for advanced Spark workloads and more complex data engineering scenarios.
Data catalog, clear ownership, access control and lineage are the minimum baseline. Without these foundations, scaling the platform increases risk instead of value.
Yes, especially when multiple people and environments are involved. Versioning, testing and controlled deployments prevent silent regressions and analytics downtime.
Contact me for a short intro call on your cloud project, data platform or cost challenge.
Based in Amsterdam. Easy to meet in person in NL or on video for EU clients.